So it software claims the advantage of past-submitted app No

So it software claims the advantage of past-submitted app No

Function paragraph 2.forty may be used to alert candidate that the software is perhaps not entitled to the benefit of the previous-registered software once the early in the day-recorded software wasn’t eligible to a filing time and you will/or failed to include the very first filing commission.

not as much as 120, 121, 365(c), otherwise 386(c) otherwise significantly less than 35 U. 119(e). In the event your previous-recorded application is an international app designating the united states, it needs to be eligible to a submitting big date according to Percent Blog post 11; if for example the past-registered software is an international construction application designating the united states, it needs to be permitted a filing time in accordance with 37 CFR 1.1023; of course, if the last-submitted software is an excellent nonprovisional application under thirty-five You. 111(a), the prior-recorded application have to be entitled to a filing time because put onward within the 37 CFR 1.53(b) otherwise 1.53(d) you need to include the basic filing commission established within the 37 CFR step 1.sixteen. See 37 CFR step one.78(d)(1). If your earlier-recorded software program is good provisional software, the last-registered app should be eligible to a filing time as lay onward within the 37 CFR step one.53(c) in addition to first processing commission need to be paid for the big date months set forth for the 37 CFR step one.53(g). Pick 37 CFR step one.78(a)(2).

So it application is perhaps not eligible to the advantage of the earlier-recorded application once the past-registered app . Candidate must remove the benefit state they the last-recorded software in the App Studies Layer (ADS) or, to have apps registered ahead of , in the Ads or even the very first phrase(s) of the requirements as the appropriate.

Examiner Note: